Thursday, May 21, 2015
Saturday, May 16, 2015
|Open me in new tab: South Park Elementary's Mr. Mackey Totally Forgets Where That Thing Goes, Mmm kay?|
"This all erroneously assumes identical twins are 100% genetically identical and that homosexuality is heritable, has only one source, and excludes obvious morphological differences between homo- and heterosexuals.
There is significant genetic variation among identical twins, including about 23% being "mirror images," which aren't even currently genetically detectable. Also, thousands of commonly occurring (at relatively static frequencies) recessive genetic "abnormalities" arise from mutations at various stages of the reproductive cycle from gamete to zygote formation.
All that "sciency" stuff aside, to ignore the obvious physical (morphology) appearances between gays and straights which CAN ONLY BE derived from the outward expression of their genes is incredibly morose for all people who argue homosexuality is ONLY a choice one makes, as if homosexuality is only defined by rational acts of sodomy versus irrational acts of the heart.
Any magazine who repeats this crap adds to the ever growing body of evidence that journalists (and especially those promoted to "editor.") are very average people--mediocre, even. Leave science and its interpretation to we who are qualified--and most of us can't even do it right (e.g., global warming). Thanks.
Oh, and I'm not gay, but $20 is $20."Seriously, the argument for homosexual genetics is extremely simple and requires nothing more than a set of ocular instrumentation and intuitive cognition, that when combined together is highly accurate and is technically called "gaydar," by people in the know.
Gaydar works by measuring where along a standard bell-curve someone morphologically appears as, or behaviorally acts like someone of the opposite sex (i.e., feminine or masculine gestures and interests) from "gay" to "not gay." You DO NOT need to go out and buy expensive gaydar devices like this device:
|An expensive Gaydar device you do not need to actually use your own natural gaydar. Nope. Don't need this.|
Nor do you have to be highly trained to operate technical military-style hardware like this and spend years as the third squad member in an Arab military:
|No, this is not actually gaydar, it's the Russian SA-15 Gauntlet surface-to-air missile system. Russians hate gays, by the way.|
|Most likely a woman who digs chicks, NTTIAWTT.*|
|Possibly two women OR two men, in love, NTTIAWTT.|
|Philosoraptor pondering its gaydar|
Here are some:
Thanks for sticking with me, but Peetey's gotta run. In a later post I'll offer some theories why homosexuality persists as a fact of biology despite it's apparent, paradoxical evolutionary disadvantages.
*Not That There Is Anything Wrong With That